When you write a critique of something, remember that unless you also outline a clear alternative with some decent argument to back up why this would be better - you are just a big whinger with nothing positive to contribute.
In my experience, the biggest whingers are generally also the biggest hypocrites - religious homophobes secretly cottage, smug wealthy ecologists fly on exotic holidays, welfare bashers immorally dodge their tax responsibilities, etc etc.
When I argue for electoral reform, or the end of drug prohibition or defend freedom of speech etc, I hope I back it up with a detailed alterntive and why I think it would make a significant improvement. Anything less is just the politics of fear that the right-wing thrive on.
It is always tempting to exagerate your case when it is so difficult to get heard in a sensationalist media that drowns out sensible debate, but the temptation has to be resisted if we are to truly get our message across.